ifc-0276

18.10 Lexical calibration and typed realization

ARTISTIC-TI–0 first supplied an infrastructure positive control: the official textual-inversion loop trained, serialized, reloaded, and replayed a nonce embedding in a fresh process. Its substantive Stable Diffusion 1.5 run was not admitted. Four learned vectors produced partial in-domain binding, but the registered natural-language paraphrase was stronger and the learned token failed the background- and style-transport thresholds. The result is therefore evidence that lexical training was executable, not that concept naming or a new visual grammar had succeeded. The initial two-direction realization likewise failed all four preregistered clauses: a learned vector and selective replay were not enough to make the relevant structure explicit.

Typed realization replaces holistic visual similarity with an explicit declaration. The synthetic artifact is represented by a body, annulus, fins, their incidence, and a protected exterior. ARTISTIC-TI–2 showed that no fixed img2img strength simultaneously preserved the declaration and produced the requested exterior change. Adaptive admission selected the first strength satisfying the structural contract for each cell. TI-2C was the first admitted result; TI-2D repeated that contract satisfaction on textured images rather than only clean controls.

The remaining question is where a failed cell should be repaired. TI-3, TI-3B, and TI-3C compare latent exterior masking, explicit scalar retraction, and componentwise retraction; each exposes a more localized obstruction. TI-3D restores the admitted parent only on typed precision and recall counter-witness sets. All 24 cells required halo width zero: the witness pixels themselves were sufficient.

ARTISTIC-TI–3D under varied prompts, styles, and backgrounds. The registered body, annulus, and fins remain recognizable while the exterior is transported. This is structural repair, not yet evidence for an autonomously invented visual language.
Figure 18.1 ARTISTIC-TI–3D under varied prompts, styles, and backgrounds. The registered body, annulus, and fins remain recognizable while the exterior is transported. This is structural repair, not yet evidence for an autonomously invented visual language.

The admitted TI-3D repair achieved structural score \(0.820\), a \(100\% \) strict-contract rate, and prompt similarity \(0.362\). Its minimal object core occupied \(12.97\% \) of the image and added counter-witness repair only \(0.55\% \). Total retraction area was \(70.43\% \) of a registered blanket alternative, below the frozen \(75\% \) ceiling. The benefit was not merely that projection worked; the obstruction localized where projection was needed.