lin-0055

3.4 Three declarations, three characteristic failures

Path agreement.

For parallel paths \(p,q:x\to y\), the declaration \(p\sim q\) asks whether \(D(p)=D(q)\). Equivariance, Bellman consistency, direct-versus-extended prediction, and argument-role transport all have this form.

Limit realization.

A designated cone can say that a representation is reconstructible from compatible views, that a shared state is an equalizer, or that a database apex is a pullback. The characteristic failure is not merely disagreement of two arrows; it can be failure of existence or uniqueness of the mediating map.

Colimit realization.

A designated cocone can describe empirical aggregation, quotient identification, or gluing of local pieces. Here the failure may be that local objects cannot be assembled into a global realization with the declared universal property.

Declaration

Question

Typical witness

Possible repair

Path equation

Do two routes agree?

Parallel-path incompatibility

Change an arrow, representation, or route

Limit cone

Is the global object determined by its views?

Missing or nonunique mediator

Add a view, constraint, or shared object

Colimit cocone

Do local pieces glue or aggregate?

Incompatible identifications or failed effectivity

Repair overlaps, quotient, or gluing data

Table 3.1 The sketch remembers which universal promise has failed.